Saturday, February 27, 2021
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Tuesday, March 18, 2014
SB2435HD1: Will GMO Labeling come back to Life in Frankenbill?
By Andrew Walden @ 4:01 PM :: 3164 Views :: GMOs

by Andrew Walden

GMO labeling died in the Senate but now anti-GMO Rep Jessica Wooley is trying a gut-and-replace maneuver to install GMO labeling requirements into SB2435, an unrelated bill on ag-related special funds, on Thursday. 

The deadline for written testimony on Wooley’s ‘Franken Bill’ SB2435HD1 is Wednesday 9AM.  The hearing—with decision making to follow--is set for March 20, 2014 at 9:35am in the State Capitol Auditorium.

Food warning labels are used only to warn of actual health hazards.  Not a single human being has ever been shown to have been harmed by GMOs.  GMO labeling could add $800 to annual grocery bills in Hawaii.

As Honolulu Advertiser Political Radar column April 24, 2013 explains, “political insiders have noted wryly…that good-government groups rarely complain about procedural maneuvers when used* to potentially advance legislation supported** by fellow progressives.” 



  *   *   *   *   *

UPDATE March 20:  Hawaii House revives, kills GMO food label bill

KITV: ...members of the committee challenged the way the bill was written and questioned how the state would enforce labeling laws.  Rep. Isaac Choy asked exactly how the state would figure out if a food had been mislabeled.

Chairwoman Wooley deferred the bill indefinitely, so it's out of consideration for this legislative session unless an unusual effort is made to bring it back.

read ... Not over until Sine Die

  *   *   *   *   *

To: House Committee on Agriculture

Rep. Jessica Wooley, Chair

Rep. Richard H.K. Onishi, Vice Chair

From: Grassroot Institute of Hawaii

President Keli’i Akina, Ph.D.


Dear Chair and Committee Members:

From ancient times the Hippocratic Oath counseled physicians with the mandate: First, do no harm.

Lawmakers would be well advised to follow the same principle whenever considering actions that would impact free enterprise and the benefits that accrue to citizens through the production and exchange of goods and services.

There is no question that the imposition of regulations, such as labeling requirements for the presence of genetically modified foods that further place the burden of absorbing the penalty upon the retailer, will have an adverse effect upon businesses, the economy and ultimately upon consumers.

The real question is whether suspected harms of genetically modified organisms have been sufficiently documented to warrant the restrictions upon business being proposed by SB 2435.

The consensus of peer-reviewed science has not, however, found GMO-enhanced agriculture to be harmful to human life, and in fact has found GMO crops to be highly beneficial to humanity.

While there are many nonscientific claims of harm, and that there are many fears by those who do not accept the consensus of scientific research, it is important for lawmakers not to act hastily.

The imposition of the regulations that would be mandated by SB 2435 would result in the following harms to business and consumers:

  1. It raises the cost and the liability of doing business in Hawaii for our agriculture industry, threatening the growth of one of the few non-tourism sectors that is helping our economy improve. In fact, this bill may even push some smaller businesses into closing; it will certainly require them to raise their prices.
  2. It creates a regulatory burden for Hawaii’s retailers that they will find both cost-prohibitive and difficult to comply with. They too will be forced to raise prices to cover the costs associated with compliance.
  3. The labeling scheme is likely to confuse or mislead consumers as to the safety of the products concerned. In addition, consumers will have to deal with increased food prices in a state that already has a very high cost of living.

Since there is such a strong conflict between the findings of peer-reviewed science and the claims of those who oppose the use of GMO’s, the responsible course of action for lawmakers should be to call for further scientific research to clarify our understanding.

This would be a prudent step to take before imposing measures that clearly would have a harmful effect upon the economy and upon the ability of everyday citizens to live in this economy.  For now, the public good is better served by government restraint.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our testimony.


Keli’i Akina, Ph.D.

President, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii



TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii


Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Blaisdell Memorial Project

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

Coffee Break

DVids Hawaii

E Hana Kakou Kelii Akina


Fix Oahu!

Follow the Money Hawaii

Frank in Hawaii

Front Page Magazine

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Advocates

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Life Alliance

Hawaii March for Life

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

Heritage Foundation



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

I Vote Hawaii

If Hawaii News

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

Iowa Meets Maui

Jackson v Abercrombie

Jihad Watch

July 4 in Hawaii

Kahle v New Hope

Kakaako Cares

Kau TEA Party

Kauai Co GOP

Keep Hawaii's Heroes


Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Mauna Kea Recreational Users Group

Middle East Forum--The Legal Project

Mililani Conservatives for Change

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

Muslim Brotherhood in America

NAMI Hawaii


National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

National Wind Watch

New Hawaiian

New Zeal

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Northwest Economic Policy Seminar

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

Now What I Really Think

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

ObamaCare Abortion Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Pacific Aviation Museum

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Republican Party -- Hawaii State

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii