Sunday, February 28, 2021
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, January 5, 2018
"Why Isn’t Honolulu Helping Businesses Hurt By Rail Construction?" (Because It Doesn't Want To, And No One Is Making It)
By Robert Thomas @ 3:07 PM :: 4238 Views :: Land Use, Rail
"Why Isn’t Honolulu Helping Businesses Hurt By Rail Construction?" (Because It Doesn't Want To, And No One Is Making It)
 
 
A recent report in Honolulu Civil Beat asks the question: "Why Isn’t Honolulu Helping Businesses Hurt By Rail Construction?" (The Civil Beat editorial board asks the same question.)  According to the report:
Two years ago, the Honolulu City Council created a fund to help businesses hurt by construction of the 20-mile long rail project. But there was a hitch: the council never appropriated any money for it.

Then last April, the council put a line item in the budget for fiscal year 2018, which began July 1 and ends June 30, offering $2 million in property tax breaks to businesses suffering losses from work on the rail line.

With five months left to go in the fiscal year and no effort to distribute those tax breaks, that offer is looking like an empty promise.

The Civil Beat story continues with reports of failing businesses, the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit's efforts to hand out discount cards for businesses impacted by rail construction, and the agency's hiring of even more employees and contractors all while many businesses have gone or are going under ("The agency will soon hire a business relations specialist to work as a liaison between the agency, contractors and businesses."). The main theme of the story is the City needs to do something.

So why hasn't the City done more than putting a line in its budget that it will take less from these business owners? (Note that in the first quote above, the City isn't actually handing out money to help these businesses, it is merely anticipating receiving less property tax from them.) The short answer to Civil Beat's question is that in the end, the City doesn't really care all that much about these particular businesses or their owners.

Perhaps a harsh assessment. But realistic if you look at it: the City's sole focus is on the actual rail construction, and getting it finished and operating, not on those whose lives and businesses get in the way. Construction delays thus far have cost the City dearly, both in money and in political and public capital, and it is committed to moving forward, and not getting distracted by accommodating any more than it absolutely needs to. And the City anticipates that once the project is up and running, businesses which survive (or new businesses that may take their place), will be there, and all will be forgotten.  

So what is a business owner to do, since waiting for the City to do the right thing isn't going to get anywhere?

Here's a lesson from a Texas restaurant owner. Or should we say "former restaurant owner" because the business folded due to loss of access and traffic after the county transit authority's adjacent rail project interfered with ingress and egress. The owner brought an inverse condemnation claim against the agency, alleging the construction and the resulting rail line which caused the his business to go under and that "once construction was completed, access to the restaurant was possible but difficult." The owners sought to "recover lost profits allegedly caused by the temporary, total denial of access to the restaurant during the construction of the North Line." They also "sought to recover for the permanent diminution in the value of the property caused by the alleged material and substantial impairment of access once the North Line construction was completed."

What distinguished this case from the usual situation where a condemnee seeks damages caused by loss of access was that here, the agency did not condemn any of the restaurant's property. The trial court dismissed the complaint, but the court of appeals reinstated the claim and allowed it to go to trial. The loss of access was not, as the rail agency argued, a "community damage" shared by all. The court concluded that if the owner were able to prove access to its property was blocked, then this was not a mere "inconvenience" resulting from the rail project, but a taking or damaging of property.

In other words, to answer Civil Beat's question, it's unlikely the City will do much, if anything, for property owners who are hurt by rail construction. It is up to the owners to help themselves.  

Links

TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote

2aHawaii

808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii

ALEC

Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

AntiPlanner

Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Blaisdell Memorial Project

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

ChinaTownWatch.com

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

Coffee Break

DeedySupport.com

DVids Hawaii

E Hana Kakou Kelii Akina

FIRE

Fix Oahu!

Follow the Money Hawaii

Frank in Hawaii

Front Page Magazine

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Habele.org

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Advocates

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Life Alliance

Hawaii March for Life

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

Heritage Foundation

HIEC.Coop

HiFiCo

Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

I Vote Hawaii

If Hawaii News

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

Iowa Meets Maui

Jackson v Abercrombie

Jihad Watch

July 4 in Hawaii

Kahle v New Hope

Kakaako Cares

Kau TEA Party

Kauai Co GOP

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

KeyWiki

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Mauna Kea Recreational Users Group

MentalIllnessPolicy.org

Middle East Forum--The Legal Project

Mililani Conservatives for Change

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

Muslim Brotherhood in America

NAMI Hawaii

NARTH

Natatorium.org

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

National Wind Watch

New Hawaiian

New Zeal

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Northwest Economic Policy Seminar

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

Now What I Really Think

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

ObamaCare Abortion Hawaii

Obookiah

OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

OurFutureHawaii.com

Pacific Aviation Museum

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

P.U.E.O.

RailRipoff.com

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Republican Party -- Hawaii State

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

SenatorFong.com

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

Waagey.org

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii

Yes2TMT