Wednesday, February 8, 2023
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Thursday, May 19, 2011
Hawaii Judges Cannot Be Impartial About Rail Project
By Selected News Articles @ 1:43 PM :: 8255 Views :: Maui County, Education K-12, Energy, Environment, National News, Ethics

Hawaii Judges Cannot Be Impartial About Rail Project

by Purna Nemani Courthouse News

(CN) HONOLULU - All nine federal judges in Hawaii have recused themselves from hearing the latest complaint, of a long string, that challenges a major transportation project in Honolulu.

With each judge stepping back from the case, 9th Circuit Judge A. Wallace Tashima will step in, according to an order filed Friday.

Chief Judge Helen Gillmor; U.S. District Judges Susan Oki Mollway, Samuel King, Alan Kay, David Ezra and J. Michael Seabright; and U.S. Magistrate Judges Barry Kurren, Kevin Chang and Leslie Kobayashi have each recused themselves on the basis of possible conflict of interest.

Tashima, who assumed senior status with the federal appeals court in 2004, has sat on other cases in Hawaii. He takes the reins from Judge Kobayashi, originally assigned to the case.

An attorney for the plaintiffs on the case, Nicholas Yost of San Francisco, took the change in stride during an interview with ABC News' Honolulu affiliate, KITV.

"I understand why the Court has taken the action that it has, and could not be more delighted at having as distinguished a judge, as Judge Tashima, appointed to hear the case," Yost told KITV.

The plaintiffs, a group of concerned Hawaii citizens and former state legislators, argue that the city and county of Honolulu, the Federal Transit Administration and Department of Transportation have exceeded their jurisdiction and violated environmental policy by failing to consider alternative technology, allow independent review and conduct legally required historic preservation surveys along the route that would span at least 20 miles of the 44-mile-long, 30-mile-wide island of Oahu.

The complaint alleges that the completed project will obstruct scenic views at the Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole Federal Building and U.S. District Courthouse - the seat of the federal government in Hawaii.

Hawaii's U. S. Marshal, Mark Hanohano, who serves as general administrator of the building, was not consulted on the project, according to the complaint.

A letter from the state's federal judges further alleges that transit planners have failed to consult any court security representatives. Judge Ezra did not sign the letter, addressed to FTA Regional Administrator Leslie Rogers in San Francisco, noting that he had recused himself from the issue.

Should the project proceed as planned in the immediate vicinity of the federal building, within feet of judges' chambers, visitors to the court could face increased terrorism vulnerability, according to the letter.

Hanohano co-signed the letter, originally posted by KITV News and shockingly dated November 2008, and writes separately to say that the proposed Halekauwila Street route "presents a severe security risk to the Federal Court Building," echoing the concern expressed by the main letter.

The main letter also states that "none of the security specialists who participated in preparing its analysis was familiar with security standards for Federal Courthouses," a fact allegedly admitted by a city security committee.

Although an attack from the proposed rail may be improbable, the judges say they remain concerned that a terrorist could use a cellphone to detonate explosives left on a train. They point to similar domestic tragedies in Oklahoma City and the World Trade Center, and note that bombs also destroyed the court building in Lebanon and the Madrid trains.

The proximity of the portion of the proposed rail to the federal building, along the narrow adjacent Halekauwila Street, is outlined in the complaint:

"The Nimitz Highway-to-Halekauwila Street alignment through downtown Honolulu (the only downtown alignment in the Project) requires that the Project be built within 45 feet of the third- and fourth-floor windows of the federal office building in which the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii is located, raising significant concerns about public safety, the possibility of terrorism, and excessive noise, vibration, and construction-related impacts," according to the complaint.

It also quotes from the letter, which reports how the city told judges that it was unlikely to alternatives, since they would require the approval of the Honolulu City Council.

"The FTA claims that more than 75 potential alignments for the project were considered; however, the FEIS presents just two," according to the complaint, referring to the final environmental impact statement. "The EIS also failed to consider an alignment in which the elevated fixed guideway would not cross downtown Honolulu, but rather would begin west of downtown and its historic sites (allowing other transportation improvements to be made downtown)."

The judges note in their letter: "We disagree that there are no reasonable alternatives."



TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii

Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii