Monday, May 25, 2020
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Tuesday, November 05, 2013
Honolulu Charter Amendment: Seize Land Within 90 Days of Council Vote
By Robert Thomas @ 1:16 PM :: 2672 Views :: Land Use
Should The Honolulu Charter Eliminate The Already Minimal Check Of A Mayoral Veto On Eminent Domain Resolutions?

by Robert Thomas, InverseCondemnation November 5, 2013

The Honolulu City Council has proposed a charter amendment that asks the voters to approve eliminating the Mayor's current veto power over the Council's eminent domain resolutions.

The Resolution doesn't directly say that, of course, but what it does command is that after the Council adopts a resolution to take property, the city administration must within 90 days start the condemnation action. In other words, no mayoral veto. Currently under the Charter, the Mayor may veto resolutions of taking:

Resolutions authorizing proceedings in eminent domain shall not be acted upon on the date of introduction, but shall be laid over for at least one week before adoption. Such resolutions shall be advertised once in a daily newspaper of general circulation and may be advertised, as deemed helpful, in other newspapers at least three days before adoption by the council. Not less than three copies of such resolutions shall be filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the city clerk at least three days prior to the adoption thereof. Upon adoption, every such resolution shall be presented to the mayor, who may approve or disapprove it pursuant to applicable provisions governing the approval or disapproval of bills.

Rev. Charter § 3-202.9 (emphasis added).

Now the possibility of a mayoral veto isn't much of a limitation on the county's powers of eminent domain (broadly delegated to the counties by state law), but at least its something. And the Council now wants to carve out an exception to the usual checks-and-balances.

According to the Resolution, the charter amendment is needed because "the Council has encountered difficulties with eminent domain proceedings because the roles of City agencies for such proceedings are not established." We're not aware of what these "difficulties" entail, and the Resolution doesn't say more, but we have to ask a couple of questions.

First, shouldn't the decision whether to take someone's private property be difficult? Or at least if there are differences of opinion within the City and County about whether to exercise eminent domain, then the decision-making process be subject to the usual checks-and-balances? And if there indeed are internal administrative problems "because the role of City agencies ... are not established," then isn't the solution to establish the procedures, and not eliminate what little protection property owners have?

Second, the Resolution makes it seem like the Council and the Mayor independently make decisions to exercise eminent domain:

WHEREAS, while most condemnation proceedings are initiated by the City Administration, the Council may of its own accord initiate proceedings to acquire private property for the City through eminent domain, subject to the payment of just compensation, regardless of whether the Mayor agrees with such actions.

State law, however, delegates the eminent domain power to "each county" and not to the Council or the Mayor, which means that the county as a whole must exercise the power as it collectively decides, with one of the only real restrictions imposed by state law being that the exercise must be accomplished by resolution. In other words, the "City Administration" doesn't initiate condemnation proceedings (it may propose them to the Council, but all takings decisions ultimately are made by Council). And if indeed there are differences of opinion between the City Administration and the City Council, then "the county" hasn't really made a decision, has it?

What this proposal would do is give the Council unfettered ability to make all condemnation decisions, and do so without any limitation from any other part of City and County government. We don't know the details of what prompted this proposal other than that, but it's a bad idea. Anything that makes the already-easy process of taking private property and impressing it into public service even easier, doesn't sound like a good thing.

The short answer to the question we posed in the title of this post: No.

TEXT: Resolution No. 13-221 (City and County of Honolulu (Sep. 16, 2013)


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

808 State Update AM940


ACA Signups Hawaii



Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Life Advocates

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

American Mothers of Hawaii



Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Audit The Rail

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii 

Blaisdell Memorial Project

Broken Trust 

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

CAFR Hawaii

Castaway Conservative

Children's Alliance Hawaii

Children's Rights Institute

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Citizens for Recall

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

Coffee Break

CSIS Pacific Forum

DAR Hawaii

DVids Hawaii

E Hana Kakou Kelii Akina

E Māua Ola i Moku o Keawe

Farmers For Choice Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Follow the Money Hawaii

Frank in Hawaii

Front Page Magazine

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Get Off Your Butts!

God, Freedom, America

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aganst Assisted Suicide

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crime Victims' Rights

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defending Marriage

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Families for Educational Choice

Hawaii Family Advocates

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Firearm Community

Hawaii Fishermen's Alliance

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii March for Life

Hawaii Meth Project

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Right to Life -- Big Island

Hawaii Right to Life -- Oahu

Hawaii Shield Law Coalition

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

Heritage Foundation

HI Coalition Against Legalized Gambling



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Homeless Crisis

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

Horns of Jericho Blog

House Minority Blog

House Republican Caucus YouTube


Hump Day Report

I Vote Hawaii

If Hawaii News

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

Iowa Meets Maui

Jackson v Abercrombie

Jihad Watch

July 4 in Hawaii

Kahle v New Hope

Kakaako Cares

Kau TEA Party

Kauai Co GOP

Keep Hawaii's Heroes


Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Mauna Kea Recreational Users Group

Middle East Forum--The Legal Project

Mililani Conservatives for Change

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

Muslim Brotherhood in America

NAMI Hawaii


National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

National Wind Watch

New Zeal

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Northwest Economic Policy Seminar

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

Now What I Really Think

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

ObamaCare Abortion Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Pacific Aviation Museum

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons 

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Republican Party -- Hawaii State

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

SIFE Remington

SIFE W. Oahu 

Sink the Jones Act

Smart About Marijuana--Hawaii

St Marianne Cope

State Budget Solutions Hawaii

State Policy Network

Statehood for Guam

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Harriet Tubman Agenda

The Long War Journal

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

Truth About Trade & Technology - Hawaii

UCC Truths

Union Members Know Your Rights

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

Valor in the Pacific

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii