Thursday, March 28, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, February 27, 2015
Why I voted to affirm Rep. Calvin Say as a qualified member of the House of Representatives
By Selected News Articles @ 8:17 PM :: 5305 Views :: Ethics, Politicians

Why I voted to affirm Rep. Calvin Say as a qualified member of the House of Representatives

by Rep. Beth Fukumoto Chang (R-Mililani)

As the Minority member on the House Special Committee to investigate the residency challenge to Rep. Calvin Say, I know many people expected me to put forward a dissenting opinion. However, after carefully reviewing both positions, I voted with my colleagues to affirm that Rep. Say is qualified to represent the 20th District in the House of Representatives.

The petitioners challenging Rep. Say's residency provided a substantial amount of evidence that Rep. Say is often absent from his home in the 20th District and that in the past couple of decades, it may not have been where he spent most of his time. I've heard from many within my own party and others who feel that the decision should have been clear – if he doesn't spend most of his time living in his home in the 20th District then he shouldn't be qualified to be a representative of that district.

It's certainly a logical conclusion, but it's not what the law says. Our law states that "The residence of a person is that place in which the person's habitation is fixed, and to which, whenever the person is absent, the person has the intention to return." Our law makes it very clear that a person's residence is determined by where they intend to reside even if they are absent from that place. In all the evidence that was given, there wasn't anything to show that Rep. Say's intention to permanently reside in his Palolo home is other than what he says it is.

I can see how that's frustrating to the petitioners. It's a law designed to ensure that voters can leave to take care of a family member, or go to school, or work outside of their districts without losing the right to vote in that district. When I went to school on the mainland, I spent the majority of my time living in Washington D.C., but this law allowed me to retain my right to vote in my hometown of Mililani where I intended to – and did - return. In that sense, it's a good law particularly for a state where so many of our residents go away to school or provide temporary live-in care for loved ones outside of the town they consider home.

However, it does provide large loopholes for elected officials that can be frustrating for individuals like the petitioners who ask how long is too long to be away from your home. When does it stop being your home? I can't answer that question, and I suspect not many people could give a definitive response. But, according to the law, it's your home as long as you intend it to be your home.

Laws can, of course, change. I'm sure it's frustrating for the petitioners that the outcome they desire may be now solely reliant on the Legislature changing the laws that govern its own members. It's unlikely to happen, particularly in a single-party dominant government, and I know that seems unfair. It's not a perfect system.

But, it would be equally unfair to the voters of Rep. Say's district if we overturned their choice without compelling evidence that Rep. Say doesn't intend to return to his Palolo home.

---30---

House Democratic Caucus Statements:

Links

TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote

2aHawaii

808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

AntiPlanner

Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii

FIRE

Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Habele.org

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

HIEC.Coop

HiFiCo

Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

MentalIllnessPolicy.org

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

Natatorium.org

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

Obookiah

OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

OurFutureHawaii.com

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

P.U.E.O.

RailRipoff.com

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

SenatorFong.com

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

Waagey.org

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii

Yes2TMT