Monday, June 01, 2020
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Tuesday, July 11, 2017
National conservative advocates for Jones Act on national security basis
By Michael Hansen @ 11:33 PM :: 3168 Views :: Jones Act, Military

National conservative advocates for Jones Act on national security basis

by Michael Hansen, Hawaii Shippers Council, July 11, 2017

The putative conservative political blog RedState published on July 10, 2017, an opinion-editorial, “Freedom through commerce: how a robust domestic shipping industry is critical to defend America,” advocating in support of the Jones Act on the basis of national security.

The op-ed was written by George C. Landrith, President and CEO of Frontiers of Freedom, a public policy think tank founded in 1995 by the late U.S. Senator Malcolm Wallop (R-WY). Frontiers mission is to promote the principles of individual freedom, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise and free markets.

In his op-ed, Landrith addresses the issue of sealift, which refers to the ocean shipping capacity available for the transport of matériel to support overseas U.S. military operations. He states this is a critical component of national security provided by the Jones Act. However, his arguments are largely based on factually inaccurate information and do not corroborate his conclusion.

In fact, today, the Jones Act (specifically Section 21 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920) has very little to do with sealift, which is largely involved with the carriage of matériel in foreign trade of the U.S. That is, sealift is waterborne transportation between domestic points within the U.S. and foreign overseas military theaters and areas of operation.

The Jones Act is a domestic shipping laws that regulates certain aspects of the carriage of merchandise between domestic points (i.e., points embraced by the coastwise laws of the U.S.). In particular, the Jones Act requires that the transportation by water between domestic points must be accomplished by vessels that are U.S.-built U.S.-flag, U.S.-manned, U.S.-owned and U.S.-managed.

The primary component of the current sealift capacity is provided by the privately-owned seagoing ships of the U.S. flag foreign (or, international) trade fleet that stood at 83 ships as of June 1, 2017. All these ships are foreign-built and approximately half are foreign-owned through specialized U.S. trusts. None of these ships are Jones Act eligible for domestic transportation. Sixty of these ships are eligible for Military Security Program ()MSP) operating subsidy payments of U.S. $5.0 million per ship annually granted to owners who agree to make their ships available for sealift as needed.

In addition, the U.S. Military Sealift Command (MSC) charters foreign flag privately-owned merchant ships from the U.S. controlled foreign shipping fleet (i.e., U.S. owned foreign flag ships) and from allied ship owners (collectively known as the NATO-owned and controlled merchant fleet). MSC also operates the government-owned merchant ships of the National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) which stood at 99 ships as of May 31, 2017.

Landrith also makes inaccurate statements.

He states, “A key feature of the Jones Act allows foreign vessels to make deliveries at only one U.S. port, requiring them to leave for other nations before they may return. Instead, only American vessels with American crews can handle shipments stopping at multiple U.S. ports.”

This is flatly untrue. In the first instance it wrongly characterizes the Jones Act. Furthermore, foreign flag ships compliant with all U.S. regulatory requirements including the U.S. Customs and Boarder Protection (CBP) are allowed and do routinely call at multiple U.S. ports on the same voyage. Those foreign flag ships are allowed to discharge inbound foreign cargo and load outbound export cargo, but are prohibited by the Jones Act from transporting cargo from one U.S. port to another.

He further states, “Foreign vessels carrying a hodgepodge of crewmen from other countries cannot simply sail up the Mississippi or other waterways into America’s heartland.” This again is not true. Foreign flag ships with foreign crewmembers on board routinely navigate the lower reaches of the Mississippi and other large U.S. rivers and the Saint Lawrence Seaway and Great Lakes. CBP inspects and controls the activities of foreign flag ships and their foreign crewmembers on board while in U.S. waters.

Key excerpts:

To project power and protect America the U.S. military requires a robust American sealift capability. Transporting materials and weaponry over across the high seas is a key component of America’s ability to protect its interests around the globe yet it is often overlooked, misunderstood and underappreciated.

Yet some in Congress and some policy advocates . . . . . advocate leaving our ability to supply our troops to chance by repealing or substantially changing “The Merchant Marine Act of 1920.” Today commonly referred to as the Jones Act, this law was passed after World War I so as to ensure that America’s ability to supply its troops in future conflicts would never again be in question.

A key feature of the Jones Act allows foreign vessels to make deliveries at only one U.S. port, requiring them to leave for other nations before they may return. Instead, only American vessels with American crews can handle shipments stopping at multiple U.S. ports. Consequently this requirement helps ensure America has a viable shipping industry and a capable American Merchant Marine to support America’s military.

Notably, the Jones Act also protects the American homeland. Foreign vessels carrying a hodgepodge of crewmen from other countries cannot simply sail up the Mississippi or other waterways into America’s heartland.

Some argue the Jones Act is outdated because it is almost 100 years old.

The Jones Act works and it makes sense. History proves it.

Imagine sending America’s high tech weapons half way around the world on a foreign owned and crewed ship. For weeks, foreign agents would have access to our highest technology.

Perhaps the most senseless reasoning for eliminating the Jones Act is that doing so would require the DOD to build, maintain and man its own ships for military sea lift. The cost to replicate the entire shipping network the Jones Act provides to our military when needed — the actual ships, logistics capabilities, global reach, manpower, etc. — is $65 billion. That’s $65 billion that wouldn’t go to our existing national security needs.

The bottom line is clear. History and today’s generals and admirals all make the same point: America needs the Jones Act. It supports our military. It aids homeland security. It promotes freedom through commerce. That’s all good for America!


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

808 State Update AM940


ACA Signups Hawaii



Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Life Advocates

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

American Mothers of Hawaii



Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Audit The Rail

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii 

Blaisdell Memorial Project

Broken Trust 

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

CAFR Hawaii

Castaway Conservative

Children's Alliance Hawaii

Children's Rights Institute

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Citizens for Recall

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

Coffee Break

CSIS Pacific Forum

DAR Hawaii

DVids Hawaii

E Hana Kakou Kelii Akina

E Māua Ola i Moku o Keawe

Farmers For Choice Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Follow the Money Hawaii

Frank in Hawaii

Front Page Magazine

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Get Off Your Butts!

God, Freedom, America

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aganst Assisted Suicide

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crime Victims' Rights

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defending Marriage

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Families for Educational Choice

Hawaii Family Advocates

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Firearm Community

Hawaii Fishermen's Alliance

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii March for Life

Hawaii Meth Project

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Right to Life -- Big Island

Hawaii Right to Life -- Oahu

Hawaii Shield Law Coalition

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

Heritage Foundation

HI Coalition Against Legalized Gambling



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Homeless Crisis

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

Horns of Jericho Blog

House Minority Blog

House Republican Caucus YouTube


Hump Day Report

I Vote Hawaii

If Hawaii News

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

Iowa Meets Maui

Jackson v Abercrombie

Jihad Watch

July 4 in Hawaii

Kahle v New Hope

Kakaako Cares

Kau TEA Party

Kauai Co GOP

Keep Hawaii's Heroes


Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Mauna Kea Recreational Users Group

Middle East Forum--The Legal Project

Mililani Conservatives for Change

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

Muslim Brotherhood in America

NAMI Hawaii


National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

National Wind Watch

New Zeal

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Northwest Economic Policy Seminar

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

Now What I Really Think

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

ObamaCare Abortion Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Pacific Aviation Museum

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons 

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Republican Party -- Hawaii State

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

SIFE Remington

SIFE W. Oahu 

Sink the Jones Act

Smart About Marijuana--Hawaii

St Marianne Cope

State Budget Solutions Hawaii

State Policy Network

Statehood for Guam

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Harriet Tubman Agenda

The Long War Journal

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

Truth About Trade & Technology - Hawaii

UCC Truths

Union Members Know Your Rights

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

Valor in the Pacific

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii