Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, April 13, 2012
Hawaii Shippers Council Outlines Jones Act Reform Proposals
By Michael Hansen @ 6:48 PM :: 13776 Views :: Jones Act

HAWAII SHIPPERS’ COUNCIL NONCONTIGUOUS TRADES JONES ACT REFORM (NTJAR) PROPOSAL OUTLINE

News Release from Hawaii Shippers Council April 12, 2012 
 
The Hawaii Shippers Council (HSC) is a business league organization incorporated in 1997 to represent cargo interests – known as “shippers” – who tender goods for shipment in the Hawaii trade.
 
In 2010, the HSC put forward a federal legislative proposal to reform the Jones Act, which is known as the Noncontiguous Trades Jones Act Reform (NTJAR – the acronym is pronounced “Nit-Jar”).
 
The NTJAR initiative would exempt just the Jones Act noncontiguous domestic trades – Alaska, Guam, Hawaii and Puerto Rico – from the U.S.-Build requirement of the Jones Act and only for large self-propelled oceangoing ships.
 
This proposal originated with HSC and does not have a mainland counterpart as did previous reform efforts during the late 1990’s with Rob Quartel and the national Jones Act Reform Coalition (JARC).
 
The HSC is not proposing to repeal the Jones Act nor create a full exemption from the Jones Act for Hawaii, Alaska, Guam and Puerto Rico.
 
NTJAR Would NOT:
  • Change the existing U.S.-Flag, US-Ownership and U.S.-Crew provisions of the Jones Act as they currently apply to the noncontiguous domestic trades.
  • Allow Foreign-Flag ships, foreign-seamen or foreign-shipowners in any domestic trade where they are not currently allowed. (They are currently allowed in domestic trade with American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is., and the U.S. Virgin Is.)
  • Apply to the domestic tug and barge industry anywhere in the U.S. including in the Jones Act noncontiguous jurisdictions.
  • Affect any shipping along the coasts of the contiguous U.S. mainland or on the inland waterways or the Great Lakes.
  • Negatively impact any maritime industry jobs in Hawaii and the other noncontiguous jurisdictions.
  • Have any material adverse effect on national security.
The NTJAR proposal is a limited and narrowly targeted reform of the Jones Act that would greatly improve the efficiency of the critical interstate oceanborne transportation between the US mainland and the domestic noncontiguous jurisdictions that is currently subject to cabotage.
 
NTJAR Would:
  • Allow U.S. shipowners to purchase large self-propelled merchant ships meeting U.S. Coast Guard standards from qualified shipbuilders in other industrial countries and renew their ageing noncontiguous fleets (average age 28 years while the international norm is 12 years) with much lower cost, more efficient modern ships.
Note: If U.S. shipowners can’t afford new U.S.-Built ships, the noncontiguous trades will be saddled with inefficient old ships that are expensive to operate – or perhaps no ships at all.
  • Substantially lower the cost and materially increase the access to major capital ships available to the Jones Act noncontiguous trades fleet; and, thus, eliminate the artificial scarcity of those vessels in the noncontiguous trades created by the U.S.-build requirement of the Jones Act.
  • Significantly reduce barriers to entry and increase competition in the Jones Act noncontiguous domestic trades.
  • Reduce freight rates – through lower capital costs and greater competition – to Hawaii, Alaska, Guam and Puerto Rico and lower the cost of living in those jurisdictions.
  • Stop consumers in the affected noncontiguous jurisdictions from being forced to pay substantially higher freight rates to subsidize an Inefficient, extremely expensive and commercially uncompetitive U.S. major shipbuilding industry that has constructed on average fewer than three large merchant ships per year since the mid-1980’s.
Note: Why should the noncontiguous consumers subsidize a couple of inefficient mainland shipyards when international yards can offer high quality ships at a third or less the cost?
 
Note: Six million noncontiguous consumers pay high prices; but the high pay jobs they subsidize go to fewer than 1200 mainland shipyard workers.
  • Puts the deep draft noncontiguous shipping industry on the same footing as other modes of domestic transportation where foreign manufactured equipment is permitted into the U.S. for commercial operation without restriction including aircraft, railroad cars and locomotives, trucks, buses, automobiles (for taxis) and mass transit vehicles.
Ninety years of Jones Act protection has resulted in the near complete collapse of the U.S. deep draft merchant shipbuilding industry, and continuing that protection for the noncontiguous trades will not save it. The Act has generally failed to achieve its intended goal to nurture the U.S. maritime industry, and commercial deep draft commercial shipbuilding in the United States is all but ended.
 
Enactment of the NTJAR proposal would revitalize the deepsea sector of the noncontiguous domestic trades, reduce the barriers to entry, increase competition and lower interstate freight rates between the US mainland and the noncontiguous jurisdictions. These positive changes would provide an important economic stimulus to Hawaii, Alaska, Guam and Puerto Rico.
Links

TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote

2aHawaii

808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

AntiPlanner

Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii

FIRE

Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Habele.org

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

HIEC.Coop

HiFiCo

Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

MentalIllnessPolicy.org

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

Natatorium.org

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

Obookiah

OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

OurFutureHawaii.com

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

P.U.E.O.

RailRipoff.com

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

SenatorFong.com

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

Waagey.org

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii

Yes2TMT