Monday, June 24, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Tuesday, April 1, 2014
HCDA ‘Small Business’ Reps: Kobayashi & Mitsunaga
By News Release @ 1:44 PM :: 7559 Views :: Development, Hawaii State Government, Small Business

HCDA: Is a Law Intending to Protect Small Businesses in Kaka’ako Now Being Cited to Help Developers?

News Release from Senator Laura Thielen, March 31, 2014

The Sunday Star Advertiser ran an article Donors with Kaka’ako Ties Spending Big on Elections.  Ironically, today our Committee reviewed the nomination of an appointee to the Hawaii Community Development Authority (HCDA), which is the Board that approves the plans, zoning and development in Kakaako.

The nominee seems like a fine gentleman.  But he works for a company that is a subsidiary of the Kobayashi Group.

According to PBN, the Kobayashi Group is an investor in a hui that plans to build one or more luxury developments in Kaka’ako.  When I asked the nominee if this was the case, he stated the Kobayashi Group had not yet announced plans, but if they did, he would recuse himself from any decisions on their permit application.

I then asked whether his voting on any Kaka’ako plans, policies and rules would be an indirect conflict of interest, because those items could make such developments easier or more lucrative.

The Director of HCDA immediately came up and testified that the law requires two members of the HCDA Board to be members of small businesses in Kaka’ako, and the law specifically stated that the “small business representatives” were permitted to vote on matters of general application, like rules.

But Senators Chun-Oakland and Slom, who helped put that law into place years ago, confirmed that the original intent of the law was to ensure that the small businesses who were getting pushed out by redevelopment would have a voice on the Board.  These were light industrial businesses, like auto-body shops, and small service businesses.

So think about this for a minute.  Let’s say the HCDA Board is going to vote on changing the height limit in Kaka’ako from 400 feet to 500 feet.  I could see supporting a law that allows the existing light industrial businesses like the auto body shop to vote on that matter.  It is highly unlikely that they could financially benefit from such a rule change.

But what about the “small business representative” who works for a subsidiary of the Kobayashi Group, which is going to develop or sell their property for luxury condominium development?  Isn’t a rule change that gives them 100 extra feet of height an extremely lucrative proposition?  Isn’t there, at a minimum, an appearance of a conflict of interest; the potential for self-dealing?  Is that really what the law intended, when it was passed years ago?

I was told today that the entire Kobayashi Group, including the subsidiary the nominee works for, is 10 employees, so it counts as a “small business.”  The other small business representative on HCDA apparently is a member of Mitsunaga & Associates, Inc., which, according to the Star Advertiser, is another firm involved in Kaka’ako development.

It seems to me we’ve lost the original intent of the law.  The business representatives appointed to the HCDA Board are not necessarily familiar with the issues facing the long-term small businesses who were the focus of the original law.  Furthermore, the permission to vote on general rules, which was originally intended to allow these small businesses to have a voice on the Board, is now being cited to allow Board members to vote on rule and policy changes that can potentially generate tremendous financial benefits for their firms.

I voted against the confirmation on those grounds.  I met with the gentleman afterwards and explained that it wasn’t personal to him.  But I’m not comfortable with the direction being taken regarding HCDA, and these kinds of appointments are not making me feel like it’s going to improve.



TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii