Thursday, November 30, 2023
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Tuesday, August 26, 2014
According To State, ACLU Complaint About Postponed Puna Primary Not An "Election Contest"
By Robert Thomas @ 8:40 PM :: 4294 Views :: Office of Elections

Great SCOT! Actually, No "SCOT" According To State: ACLU Complaint About Postponed Puna Primary Not An "Election Contest"

by Robert Thomas, Inverse Condemnation, August 26, 2014

You can tell what kind of case is before what Hawaii appellate court by the case designation at the top of the fist page flysheet. First two letters are the court, second two are the type of case, followed by the actual case number. Thus, when a case is labeled "CAAP," that means its before the Intermediate Court of Appeals, and it is an appeal. When it says "SCJD" it's a case of judicial discipline before the Supreme Court. "SCWC" means a writ of cert before the Supreme Court. And so on.

It's rare that we see cases labeled "SCOT," since that means "Supreme Court - Other." Mysterious. Or, maybe not so mysterious since it could be an election contest under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-172, which gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over such cases. So it was last week, when the ACLU Hawaii and other plaintiffs invoked the court's "Other" jurisdiction and filed Lathers v. Abercrombie, No. SCOT 14-0001069, which asks the court to allow Big Island voters who were not able to make it to the polls on primary day because of the tropical storm, to vote even though the nominees have already been selected. 

Yesterday, the state defendants (the Governor, the Attorney General, the state's Chief Election Officer) filed a Motion to Dismiss which asserts that the case doesn't deserve an "OT," but rather belongs in circuit court (Hawaii's trial court of general jurisdiction), since it isn't really an "election contest."

We detailed the allegations in the complaint in this post, in which we did some issue spotting. Sure enough, the state's motion raises arguments which we are not surprised to see: the case is not an "election contest" over which the Supreme Court of Hawaii can exercise original jurisdiction, and even if it qualified, the complaint doesn't state a claim for a primary election contest in which the only remedy the Supreme Court can impose is a declaration that one candidate or another is a party's nominee.

Bottom line, as the motion puts it, "This case is a civil action filed in the wrong court, and nothing more." 

There's a little daylight for the plaintiffs in that the Hawaii Supreme Court has on occasion exercised its original election contest jurisdiction over a case which was not a "typical" election contest. See, e.g, Taomae v. Lingle, 108 Haw. 245, 118 P.3d 1188 (2005). But those cases, according to the state's motion, are really about the validity of constitutional amendments that were on the ballot, and not a primary election, as here. Motion at 6. We'll see if the plaintiffs' arguments get any traction with the court. 

More on the arguments via the Honolulu Star-Bulletin's story, "State wants suit over election to be dismissed."

PDF:  State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Lathers v. Abercrombie, No. SCOT 14-0001...


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii