Wednesday, July 17, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Saturday, November 7, 2015
Asia, Europe look at Jones Act
By Michael Hansen @ 11:59 PM :: 4169 Views :: Jones Act

Singapore: Jones Act Savaged

by Michael Hansen, Hawaii Shippers Council, November 6, 2015

The online maritime publication Splash 24/7 reported on November 5th in an article entitled, “Jones Act savaged,” regarding an online poll conducted by their sister publication Maritime CEO known as the “MarPoll” which asked about U.S. Jones Act cabotage. Nearly two-thirds of respondents said that the Jones Act doesn’t serve its purpose.

Splash 24/7 is published by Singapore headquartered Asia Shipping Media (ASM). Founded in 2012 by shipping media veterans Grant Rowles and Sam Chambers ASM is now the parent of a host of media brands. ASM states “Splash 24/7 provides the latest incisive, exclusive maritime news, plus interviews and in-depth analysis on global maritime, shipping media and much more.”

Key excepts:

The Jones Act, the 95-year-old cabotage laws that govern US waters, has come in for savage criticism from our readers. In the latest MarPoll, the quarterly online topical survey carried on this site for sister title Maritime CEO, 65.2% of the 400 plus respondents so far believe the Jones Act is not fit for purpose.

The legislation has been under the spotlight lately following the sinking on October 1 of the 40-year-old El Faro boxship, a US flagged vessel belonging to American owner, Tote.

“The Jones Act is clearly dangerous for shipping with a 40-year container vessel remaining in service. Furthermore, at the insane price of $150m for a 50,000 dwt product tanker built in the US, the business model is not a commercially sustainable without the US government’s misguided support,” one respondent to our survey commented.

Another voter claimed: “The Jones Act is counter-productive and a main reason why the US Merchant Navy has declined to almost nothing.”

There were, however, plenty of supporters to the legislation.

“If anything the Jones Act should be enhanced with laws to include both subsidies and training for US shipbuilders and mariners. This will provide jobs and help with infrastructure to promote a better America,” argued another reader.

  *   *   *   *   *

Oslo: National security division shows why Jones Act is a touchy subject

by Michael Hansen, Hawaii Shippers Council, November 6, 2015

The Oslo-based international maritime publication TradeWinds published on November 6, 2015, an article entitled “National security division shows why Jones Act is a touchy subject” reporting that opposition to eliminating the U.S. build requirement of the Jones Act is largely based upon the national security argument that the country must maintain its shipbuilding industrial base.

Key excerpts:

Proponents say elimination of the US-build requirement would create more US mariner jobs, while supporters — and the Obama administration — say the country needs its shipyards

We have written in these pages that it is impossible to fully capture the Jones Act, the US cabotage law that is both embattled and firmly entrenched in a debate over free trade versus protectionism. After all, it is a law aimed primarily at meeting the needs of the US national defence. But what if a debate was held that focused solely on that national security lynchpin as the most controversial element of the law?

Some shipping industry stakeholders say they do not oppose most pillars of the Jones Act and question only the US-build requirement. For example, members of an ad hoc group of those seeking reform, which includes the likes of Heidmar founder Per Heidenreich and former ExxonMobil shipping chief Bob Curt, challenge the very national security arguments at the heart of this mandate.

Meanwhile, Jones Act supporters, who are opposed to any changes to the text of the law or weakening of its application, point to two key defence benefits of the current US cabotage regime.

And it works to ensure that by supporting a shipyard industrial base, there is a market for commercial ship orders during the troughs of military ship-construction projects, they argue.

But supporters of changing the Jones Act say removing this US-build requirement will actually increase the number of US-citizen mariners by making it cheaper to build vessels, opening demand for more US-flag ships, for example, in the bulker and tanker trades.

“The size of the US merchant marine would explode without the US-build requirement, adding thousands of high-paying, steady jobs and getting thousands of trucks off our crowded highways,” said Curt, a retired chief executive of shipowner MLR Petroleum, former managing director at Nakilat and a former general manager of ExxonMobil’s marine-transport division.

The Hawaii Shippers’ Council (HSC) is advocating a waiver to the US-build requirement for Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico and Guam on grounds that these non-contiguous states and territories suffer from higher shipping costs because of the Jones Act. HSC president Mike Hansen contends that most major US yards build only military vessels.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii