Friday, June 14, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Saturday, June 4, 2016
Homosexual Dumps Boyfriend: Hawaii Supreme Court to Decide Parental Rights over Child
By News Release @ 4:10 PM :: 4893 Views :: Family
From Hawaii State Supreme Court (LINK)
No. SCAP-15-0000022, Thursday, June 30, 2016, 11:15 a.m.

WILLIAM NEWCOMB, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. STEPHEN MCPEEK, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

The above-captioned case has been set for argument on the merits at:

Supreme Court Courtroom
Ali`iolani Hale, 2nd Floor
417 South King Street
Honolulu, HI 96813

Attorney for Petitioner: Michael S. Zola

Attorneys for Respondent: Brian J. De Lima, Francis R. Alcain, and Justin P. Haspe

NOTE: Order granting Application for Transfer, filed 11/06/15.


Brief Description:

This case was transferred to this court from the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) on November 6, 2015. It concerns the interpretation and constitutionality of Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-46, which provides standards that family courts apply in custody proceedings. Specifically, this case raises issues with regard to the awarding of custody to nonparents who have de facto, or actual, custody under HRS § 571-46(a)(2).

Petitioner and Respondent were in a committed relationship and living together when Respondent legally adopted Child. Petitioner and Respondent made the decision to adopt child and raise her as a family. Petitioner also planned to adopt Child; however, Petitioner’s planned adoption of Child never occurred, and the parties later ended their relationship. Petitioner filed a petition for joint custody with the Family Court of the Third Circuit (family court), seeking joint custody of Child pursuant to HRS § 571-46(a)(2). Following an evidentiary hearing in which the family court received expert testimony from both Respondent and Petitioner, the family court denied Petitioner’s petition for joint custody based on a finding that Child would not be harmed from termination of the relationship and because Petitioner did not establish a compelling state interest as to why HRS § 571-46(a)(2) should apply when in fact the parties were not married or in a civil union.

Petitioner raises four points of error on appeal: (1) the family court erroneously interpreted Hawai`i and federal law in concluding that it would infringe on Respondent’s parental autonomy to find Petitioner was a de facto parent; (2) the family court abused its discretion in qualifying Respondent’s expert and receiving her testimony; (3) the family court abused its discretion in overruling Petitioner’s objections to Respondent’s expert’s testimony; and (4) the family court erred in requiring Petitioner to establish the constitutionality of the application of HRS § 571-46(a)(2) in this case. Respondent maintains that he is the only legal parent of Child and that the family court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Petitioner had not established a right to joint custody of Child. Respondent also argues that the family court did not abuse its discretion in qualifying Respondent’s expert.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii