Sunday, July 21, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Sunday, July 31, 2016
Time for the Subcontract Deduction to Be Upended? Hafa Adai!
By Tom Yamachika @ 5:01 AM :: 4562 Views :: Taxes

Time for the Subcontract Deduction to Be Upended? Hafa Adai!

by Tom Yamachika, President, Tax Foundation Hawaii

With so much going on in our hot construction market these days, we take a look this week at the general excise tax (GET) “subcontract deduction”.

To help the construction industry, our GET law provides that the contractor may deduct for GET purposes payments made to a subcontractor. So if a home owner pays a general contractor $1000 to do a particular project, and the general contractor pays an electrical subcontractor $300 to do part of the project, the general is taxed on $700 and the sub is taxed on $300. Both are taxed at the retail rate (4% or 4.5%).

The special treatment, however, applies only to subcontractors. If the same general instead paid $300 to a supply house for lumber, there would be no deduction. The contractor would get taxed on the full $1000 and the supply house would get taxed on $300, but at the 0.5% wholesale rate. Sometimes it is hard to distinguish between “subcontractors” and everyone else, which is where life starts to get complicated. Not only are there questions on how to classify various service providers such as planners and interior designers, but it is possible for a vendor to be a subcontractor on one project and a simple materials provider or service provider on another one, with dramatically different tax results.

Next, it is tough to ensure that the different parties in the economic chain treat the transaction consistently. Before the late 1990s, the subcontract deduction was contingent upon the subcontractor reporting the payment of tax on the transaction. So if in the case above the general paid the sub $300 plus tax and the subcontractor didn’t pay the tax, the deduction could be disallowed so the general contractor would have to pay the tax again, this time to the State. The Department adopted rules to say that the general could cut a check for the tax made payable jointly to the sub and the State. But there were reported instances where the sub took the check to the State and paid other taxes (payroll taxes, for example) and the State nailed the general for GET again. This barbaric rule was changed in 1998 so that the general now only needs to list the subcontractor’s GET number. The new rule helps a little, but it certainly can’t ensure that the parties are taking consistent positions. Thus, this year the Department adopted a rule that allows general contractors and subs see each other’s returns. That rule, questionable to begin with, probably won’t help matters much because most generals and most subs have lots of other business reported on their returns.

Perhaps we can take a look at one of our neighbors for an idea to deal with this problem. Guam also has a gross receipts tax, called the Business Privilege Tax, that looks very much like our GET. Their tax had a subcontract deduction that worked like ours. They had issues with military contracts that were subcontracted to companies outside of Guam, and in some cases those companies did not file Guam tax. In 2010, they dealt with the problem by turning their subcontract taxing system upside down. Guam’s Public Law No. 30-230 provided that the general no longer gets a deduction for payments to its subs, but the subs are exempt on the revenue coming from the general. This produces the same economic result with fewer moving parts: the general pays retail rate tax on the full contract price in all cases, and most questions about whether a vendor is a subcontractor, service provider, or materials supplier are resolved at the vendor level without involving the general. If the vendor is outside of Guam and doesn’t pay tax, the issue would be resolved by the general, who would need to pay Use Tax if the vendor is not a qualifying subcontractor.

How about it, Hawaii? Won’t that fix to the system make life in our contracting industry a lot easier? It deserves serious consideration.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii