Saturday, June 22, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Saturday, August 5, 2017
Why a Tax on Soda is Unhealthy
By Keli'i Akina PhD @ 5:14 PM :: 6451 Views :: Health Care, Taxes, Cost of Living

Why a Tax on Soda is Unhealthy

by Dr Keli'i Akina, Ph.D., Grassroot Institute, August 5, 2017

Hawaii has no soda tax. But that's not for lack of trying.

Ever since the coordinated nationwide push for taxes on sodas and sweetened drinks began a few years ago, the possibility of a soda tax has been very real in the Aloha State. In the 2011 and 2013 legislative session, then-Gov. Neil Abercrombie made a serious effort to impose such a tax, though the measures eventually failed.

But they haven't gone away either. During the 2017 session, there were multiple resolutions and bills (in both the House and Senate) aimed at requiring people who buy sweetened drinks to pay a special tax. Though usually called a soda tax, the proposed levy usually not just sodas but also juices, sports drinks and any other drink with sugar in it. Sometimes, the proposals even included diet drinks.

The rationale for soda taxes is always related to "fighting obesity" in some way, but make no mistake, this is ultimately a way for the state to increase its revenue.

Which makes Philadelphia's experience an important lesson for any Hawaii lawmakers still itching to tax sodas.

According to a study from the Tax Foundation, Philadelphia's soda tax has been a dismal failure. The tax, which went into effect on January 1 of this year, is 1.5 cents per ounce — about 24 times the tax on alcoholic beverages. Some of the support for the tax is because of the programs it is supposed to fund, notably early childhood education. Unfortunately, only 49 percent of the tax revenues go to pre-kindergarten education. What's more, revenues are far below expectations. And that's threatening the future of those programs.

Most economists will tell you that consumption taxes decrease consumer spending on the taxed item or activity. And that's exactly what happened in Philadelphia. With steep soda taxes significantly increasing the cost of soda, consumers have drifted toward alcohol, cut soda consumption, or travel outside the city to buy soda without the tax. The fact that people travel to avoid the tax underlines another unattractive facet of the surcharge: It's regressive. Not only does it have the hardest impact on those least able to afford it, but that same group is also least likely to be able to leave the city to avoid it.

Philadelphia's original estimates were that the city would make $46.2 million on the tax by the end of the 2017 fiscal year (in June). Instead, it raised only $39.4 million. Some local distributors have seen their sales of soda decrease by 50 percent in just a few months. The Pepsi and Coca-Cola companies have announced local layoffs due to decreased soda sales. The city is even facing a lawsuit over the tax.

In other words, the tax operated exactly like economists would have predicted: It discouraged people from buying the taxed item, and in doing so, has threatened the sustainability of the programs that it was intended to help in the first place.

There is a lesson in here for the Hawaii Legislature, which often looks to tax surcharges to raise money for everything from education to elder care. Regressive consumption taxes are not a viable way to fund government programs. Rely on them and all you'll have is an angry citizenry and less revenue than you hoped for. In short, you can't outsmart economic reality.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii