Sunday, May 26, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, July 13, 2018
To What Extent Does Your State Rely on Corporate Income Taxes?
By Tax Foundation @ 2:42 AM :: 3835 Views :: Hawaii Statistics, Taxes

State ranking by corporate income tax reliance. CIT

To What Extent Does Your State Rely on Corporate Income Taxes?

by David Raymond and Katherine Loughead, Tax Foundation, July 11, 2018

Over the past few weeks, we have examined the primary sources of state and local tax revenue and the extent to which states rely on each tax type. Today’s map looks at the corporate income tax, which, compared to property, sales, and individual income taxes, generates a relatively small share of state and local tax revenue. In fiscal year 2015, the most recent year for which data is available, the corporate income tax generated only 3.7 percent of total state and local tax revenue nationwide (see Facts and Figures table 8).

Of all states, New Hampshire relies most heavily on corporate income tax revenue, which accounts for 9.3 percent of the state’s total state and local tax collections. New Hampshire’s decision not to collect sales tax or levy an individual wage income tax contributes to heavier reliance on the corporate income tax. Second most reliant is Delaware, where the corporate income tax generates 9 percent of state and local tax revenue. Like New Hampshire, Delaware lacks a sales tax. The third most reliant state is Alaska, with corporate income taxes accounting for 8.8 percent of total collections. Alaska levies neither an individual income tax nor a statewide sales tax, though localities have the option of taxing sales.

Six states do not levy a corporate income tax: Nevada, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming. However, among these states, Nevada, Ohio, Texas, and Washington instead levy a harmful gross receipts tax on businesses. On the map above, several states with no corporate income tax will appear to have a small percentage of corporate income tax revenue due to income taxes levied on special corporation types, such as financial institutions.

Corporate income tax revenue, on average, accounts for such a small share of state and local tax collections in part because businesses have shifted from the traditional C corporation structure. Today, nine out of 10 businesses in the U.S. are structured as pass-through entities (partnerships, S corporations, and sole proprietorships), which are not subject to the corporate income tax. Instead, these businesses “pass” their income “through” to their owners, and business income is reported on owners’ personal tax returns and subject to individual income tax rates.

It is important to remember that just as the personal income tax is only one of many taxes an individual might pay, so is the corporate income tax only one of many taxes a business might pay. Franchise taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and excise taxes are among the other types of tax liabilities businesses might incur in the course of doing business.

A landmark study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found the corporate income tax to be particularly harmful to economic growth. Also, economic downturns or fluctuations in the business cycle may cause a business to experience periods of unprofitability, therefore owing no corporate income tax liability in such years. This cyclical nature of corporate profits means corporate tax collections become one of the most volatile sources of state revenue.

In an attempt to make up for some of the harmful effects of corporate income taxes, states have been known to offer tax incentive packages to attract (or keep) businesses in their state. This, however, can result in lower tax liability for certain businesses and industries, which makes the tax code less neutral while shrinking the tax base.

The volatility of corporate income tax revenue, as well as its narrowing base, has contributed to states’ decisions to reduce reliance on this revenue source over time.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii