Saturday, April 13, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, October 5, 2018
Supreme Court to Hear Counties’ Challenge to HSTA Rent tax
By News Release @ 2:44 PM :: 4721 Views :: Education K-12, Taxes

Why we joined the ‘surcharge’ lawsuit

Suing over 'surcharge'

From Grassroot Institute, October 5, 2018

Shakespeare said that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet — proof that he wasn’t a lawyer … or a politician. Either of them would tell you that a “surcharge” smells a lot better to voters than a “tax.”

And that’s one of the problems with the ballot measure to raise taxes for public education.

The actual wording of the proposal that goes before Hawaii voters Nov. 6 is, “Shall the legislature be authorized to establish, as provided by law, a surcharge on investment real property to be used to support public education?”

You’ll notice that not only does it not define the term “investment real property” or what precisely will be funded in public education, but it also doesn’t use the word “tax.”

That may seem like a little thing, but consider if the question was worded more accurately: “Shall the legislature be given a new constitutional power to raise taxes on real property for state use?”

Giving the Legislature an entirely new taxation power is a much different thing in the eyes of voters than levying a “surcharge,” which implies a trifling sum, like a tip or service charge.

Language matters. The fact that the ballot measure was worded in this way was a clear attempt to sway voters to a particular side. And that isn’t how the democratic process should work.

That’s why the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii has joined the amicus brief of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii in the lawsuit by the counties to stop the measure from appearing on the ballot. The counties argue that the language on the ballot is intentionally deceptive, and we agree.

Courts have been clear that the language of a ballot measure should not be designed to mislead or deceive voters. In addressing a similar attempt at “wordsmithing” on a proposed amendment to the state Constitution, the Supreme Court of Florida wrote, “The voters … deserve nothing less than clarity when faced with the decision of whether to amend our state constitution, for it is the foundational document that embodies the fundamental principles through which organized government functions.”

The lawsuit from Hawaii’s counties isn’t just a technical matter or a last gasp to control property taxes. As proof that it touches on a serious question of law, the Hawaii Supreme Court has accepted the case for oral argument, which will be held Thursday, Oct. 18, at 8:45 a.m. Because most extraordinary writ petitions are denied without argument, the fact that the court has allowed this one to proceed likely indicates that it is concerned about the question at stake.

It is true that the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii has concerns that go far beyond the wording of this amendment, but part of the problem is that the language of it forestalls a fair public debate.

There is a time and place for clever wording and persuasive language. But that place is not a ballot measure that would dramatically change our state’s founding document.

E hana kākou! (Let’s work together!)

Keli'i Akina, Ph.D.


  *   *   *   *   *

Hawai‘i Supreme Court grants counties’ Petition for Extraordinary Writ Seeking Pre-election Relief regarding constitutional amendment

News Release from City and County of Honolulu, October 4, 2018

Honolulu – After the filing of a Petition for Extraordinary Writ Seeking Pre-election Relief by the City and County of Honolulu, Hawai‘i County, the County of Kaua‘i and the County of Maui on September 26, the counties learned today that the Hawai‘i Supreme Court has agreed to schedule oral argument on whether the Legislature’s proposed constitutional amendment to tax real property is unclear and misleading (note attached order).

In the writ the counties ask the Hawai‘i Supreme Court for an order invalidating the ballot question prior to the November 6 general election. If the state’s high court finds the question is invalid, the state’s chief election officer could then issue a public proclamation stating that the question regarding the constitutional amendment should not have appeared on the ballot and should be considered stricken, and that any votes for or against the measure will not be counted and have no impact.

“The counties filed this petition for extraordinary writ so that we could argue the merits of our case before the state’s highest court, and we are pleased that chance has now been afforded to us,” said Honolulu Corporation Counsel Donna Leong. “Hawai‘i residents should know exactly what they are voting for and the counties believe that’s clearly not the case since the question that will appear on ballots proposes a new tax, but does not mention the word ‘tax.’ The question that is being asked also fails to define ‘investment real property,’ which would be the basis of the new tax.”

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument on the proposed constitutional amendment on Thursday, October 18 at 8:45 a.m. at Aliʻiōlani Hale.


PDF: Court Order

Maui County News Release: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii Accepts Counties Petition Regarding Constitutional Amendment

SA: Hawaii Supreme Court will hear counties’ challenge on constitutional amendment question


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii