Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Sunday, March 10, 2019
Hawaii Supreme Court: Must Employer Hold Open Injured Worker's Position Eternally?
By Robert Thomas @ 4:33 PM :: 5280 Views :: Health Care, Labor, Small Business

Amicus Brief: Employer Can Fill Injured Worker's Position If There Are Legitimate Business Reasons For Doing So

by Robert Thomas, Inverse Condemnation, March 8, 2019

A bit off of our usual topics, but we thought we would post this anyhow to show we're not one-trick ponies: here's the amicus brief we filed yesterday in the Hawaii Supreme Court in an employment law case the court is considering. Yes, we do appeals on employment law, too. 

The issue is whether under Hawaii law, an employer is required to hold open the position of an injured worker indefinitely, or can permanently fill that position with another worker when it has legitimate business reasons for doing so. As our brief argues:

The question presented is whether in Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-32(a)(2), the legislature intended to require employers to hold open a long-absent injured worker’s position indefinitely, or whether by prohibiting adverse actions by the employer “solely because the employee has suffered a work injury,” it meant to preserve employers’ flexibility to hire a replacement as may be needed to address pressing business demands.

The ICA [Intermediate Court of Appeals] correctly understood that the plain language of the statute preserves the prerogative of an employer to make necessary business decisions about staffing needs, so long as the employer does not “suspend, discharge, or discriminate” an employee only because the employee is injured. Id. (quoted in ICA Op. at  6). The circuit court concluded—and the ICA affirmed—that BCI did not discharge Petitioner solely because of her injury. BCI needed to fill the position with someone who could handle its continued workload because Petitioner’s long absence was causing strain on two other employees who had been forced to work longer hours to cover these duties; consequently the position was no longer open when Petitioner finally informed BCI she was ready to work.

In short, legitimate business concerns caused BCI to fill the spot permanently, and thus, Petitioner’s injury was not the sole reason for discharge. Certainly, but for Petitioner’s injury, there was no need to fill her position. See Cert. App. at 7 (“Stated otherwise, but for that injury, there was no need to fill her position.”). However, “but for” causation is not the standard established by the statute’s use of the term “solely.” That statutory term means that an employee’s injury may be part of the reason for the employer’s actions, but it cannot be the only reason. Here, it was not.

The ICA’s reading of the plain statutory text makes sense because it protects injured employees from adverse actions only on account of their injury, but also appreciates the practical realities that employers face when an essential position is left vacant during a prolonged and indefinite absence.

The interpretation advocated by Petitioner effectively deletes the term “solely” from the statute, and would read it as conferring an entitlement for permanent employment, regardless of how greatly the position’s mounting workload may strain the employer. This would create extreme practical difficulties for small businesses with limited resources.

Our colleagues Luke Wake (NFIB) and Loren Seehase (Damon Key) did the heavy lifting on this one.

If this kind of thing interests you, check it out. If not, we will return to our regularly scheduled takings programming shortly. 

PDF: Brief Amicus Curiae of NFIB Small Business Legal Center, Josue v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, No...


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute


Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii


Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii


National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii


Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns


West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii