Sunday, February 25, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Thursday, July 13, 2023
Hawaii Sues Pay Pal over Scams
By Court House News @ 3:46 PM :: 1297 Views :: Pierre Omidyar

PayPal looks to dismiss claims it froze accounts and turned a blind eye to scams

Hawaii levied unfair and deceptive practice claims against PayPal and Venmo in December, saying residents had their accounts locked without warning or were victimized by scams and couldn’t recover their money. 

Editor’s Note: PayPal is 6% owned by Civil Beat owner Pierre Omidyar.

by Candace Cheung, Court House News, July 12, 2023

HONOLULU (CN) — PayPal squared off with the state of Hawaii Wednesday morning over the state’s claims that it unfairly froze resident’s accounts and failed to protect them from scams.  

In a December 2022 complaint, the state said that the financial company “deprived Hawai‘i consumers of reliable access to their own money; rendered them vulnerable to, and in fact, the victims of, fraud; and undermined their ability to protect their own privacy and make informed decisions regarding the electronic payments services they wish to use.”

The state brought the claims on behalf of those who rely on alternative electronic payment systems — particularly, the unbanked and underbanked population that lack affordable access to traditional banking services, who, according to the complaint, make up 20% of the state’s residents. These individuals, the state said, found their funds, typically used for life necessities like rent and groceries, suddenly frozen. They had no options to appeal the freeze but were still allowed to deposit funds, according to the complaint.

Hawaii said that PayPal and its subsidiary Venmo offered no recourse for people who had been scammed through the platforms and wouldn’t reimburse funds after fraud reports. The state also claimed that Venmo violates user’s privacy by making personal information public without allowing people to opt out of displaying this information. 

Representatives for PayPal, who asked Oahu Circuit Court Judge Lisa Cataldo on Wednesday to dismiss the complaint, said the state’s accusations of unfair and deceptive acts were incomplete and ignored the full context of the payment platforms’ user agreements and policies. 

Cataldo questioned the parties on whether the case met standards for particularity. The state argued that, at the early stage of the case, it didn’t need to show actual falsity, though it did provide examples of misled Hawaii consumers. PayPal maintained that the complaint lacked definite statements that misled users. The state also noted that several cases within the last five years from the Hawaii Supreme Court indicated that the plausibility standard for unfair or deceptive acts or practices cases could apply differently in Hawaii. 

Daniel Kearney, attorney for Paypal with Washington, D.C.’s Kirkland & Ellis, said that all of the state’s alleged deceptive practices were disclosed in user agreements when PayPal and Venmo users signed up with the platforms. He pointed to the net impression of the disclosures, saying that deceptive practice cases typically consist of a defendant that makes a specific false statement that acts as a “gotcha” to lure in customers, which Hawaii didn’t claim. 

“Our issue is that they don’t allege a bold print claim,” Kearney said. 

Kearney identified several advertisements for PayPal and Venmo mentioned by the state in their complaint that describe how funds on the platforms can be easily deposited and transferred, which he said were generic ad declarations, and “not actionable statements.”  Without these “headline claims” associated with the deceptive act accusations, PayPal argues, there is no basis to bring the claims at all. 

The state provided examples in the complaint of PayPal and Venmo users having their accounts and funds frozen for unspecified violations of the user agreement. 

The state, represented locally by Honolulu law firm Cronin, Fried, Sekiya, Kekina & Fairbanks, countered that Paypal and Venmo’s disclosures are far from intuitive and inadequately explain the ins and outs of the accounts. It also accused PayPal of deliberately walking a “fine line” between what falls under covered fraud activity or user agreement violations. 

Attorney for the plaintiff, Emmy Levens, of New York’s Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll, noted that the user agreements and privacy policies PayPal pointed to were thousands of words long and sometimes not even properly linked to when signing up for the platforms. 

Referencing user agreements submitted as exhibits by PayPal alongside their motion to dismiss, Levens said, “Defendants understood that even lawyers needed to be pointed toward them.”

Caltado indicated she would rule on the motion to dismiss by the end of the week.

Links

TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote

2aHawaii

808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

AntiPlanner

Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii

FIRE

Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Habele.org

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

HIEC.Coop

HiFiCo

Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

MentalIllnessPolicy.org

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

Natatorium.org

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

Obookiah

OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

OurFutureHawaii.com

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

P.U.E.O.

RailRipoff.com

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

SenatorFong.com

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

Waagey.org

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii

Yes2TMT