Thursday, July 18, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Sunday, February 24, 2013
Bill 4 to Create New Honolulu Council Slush Fund?
By Natalie Iwasa @ 6:43 PM :: 6770 Views :: Honolulu County, Ethics

Bill 4 to Create New Honolulu Council Slush Fund?


by Natalie J. Iwasa, CPA


Last year, Honolulu councilmembers felt obligated to propose a charter amendment to fund a new county grants-in-aid (GIA) program, because funding from the federal government under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs was declining.  Despite concerns raised about various components of the proposed program, councilmembers unanimously adopted Resolution 12-44, CD1, FD1,.  Voters subsequently approved the charter amendment.


One of the concerns raised about that resolution and related charter amendment is that councilmembers took out the requirement that the recipients of the grants be 501(c)(3) charitable organizations.  The final wording, “federal income tax exempt non-profit organizations,” means that organizations such as labor unions, political action committees, social clubs and credit unions, are eligible for these grants. 


Why was this change made?  Perhaps the answer lies in the proposed law and policy councilmembers are planning for the fund. 


Bill 4 (2013) and Resolution 13-24 are the measures that will be used to implement the GIA fund and program.  The bill indicates that “council shall select the projects to be funded.”  Not only do they want to select the projects, but they want to do so through the budget process. 


Why use the budget process?  Could it be that the budget is a huge document, and any grant recipients would be buried among hundreds of lines of dollar amounts and text?  This is not a very transparent method of doling out precious taxpayer money.


In addition, the budget chair is the one who decides which amendments get put into the budget.  In the past, we’ve seen members being “punished” for one reason or another and not have their measures even heard.  The budget is an all-or-nothing proposal.  If the budget chair decides not to put in a project from a councilmember, it is highly unlikely that the budget would be voted down because it didn’t include a particular project.


Councilmembers have at least considered that some districts may get left out in the cold using this method.  Resolution 13-24, which sets the policies for this new fund, indicates that at least $250,000 should go to each council district.  This, however, has its own problems. 


What happens if there are no eligible projects for a certain district?  What if there is a particular project in another district that is more beneficial?  


Bill 4, CD1, establishes a new “advisory commission” to review applications and make recommendations based on the priorities set by councilmembers.  That’s another warning flag.  This commission should hold public meetings that allow for public input.  Agendas and minutes of these meetings should be made public.  The commission should select the grant awardees, not councilmembers.  Council should then approve or disapprove of the selections made via a separate resolution, not by burying it in the budget.  This would allow for independent selection, apart from councilmembers who may feel pressure to “reward” nonprofits that have donated to their campaigns directly or indirectly via executive directors and/or employees.


These measures are nearing the end of their approval process.  Bill 4, CD1, passed second reading unanimously.  Resolution 13-24 is recommended for adoption and will likely be considered at the next full council meeting.


The media and other public forums have not raised one single question with respect to this program.  Perhaps that is the greatest concern.




June 2011: Resignation call after Audit reveals “ward heeler’s slush fund” overseen by Honolulu Councilman


October 2012: On the Honolulu Ballot: $5M Ward Heelers' Slush Fund


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii