Thursday, February 29, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Sunday, February 13, 2011
Supreme Court to hear Case: Do elected officials with Conflict of Interest have a right to vote?
By Robert Thomas @ 3:20 PM :: 6372 Views :: National News, Ethics

U.S. Supreme Court To Decide Whether A Councilmember With A Conflict Of Interest Has a First Amendment Right To Vote Anyway

From InverseCondemnation

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide a case about whether state laws which require elected officials to recuse themselves from considering matters on which they appear to have conflicts of interest, impermissibly infringe upon the officials' First Amendment rights.

This issue has wide-ranging importance to the players in the land use arena since the Court's ruling has the potential of invalidating (or subjecting to serious challenge) state and local regulations nationwide which govern conduct of members of city and county councils and boards of supervisors, planning commissions, zoning boards of appeals, and similar state and local government bodies.

In Comm'n on Ethics of the State of Nevada v. Carrigan, No. 10-568 (cert. granted Jan 7, 2011), the Nevada Supreme Court invalidated a Nevada law which required a Sparks, Nevada city councilmember to recuse himself from considering an application to develop a hotel/casino because the developer's "consultant" was a "longtime professional and personal friend" of the councilmember, and had been his campaign manager.

Nevada law requires recusal when a matter involves members of the official's household, her relatives or employers, people with whom the official has a business relationship, or "any other commitment or relationship that is substantially similar to a [prohibited] commitment or relationship." The councilmember disclosed his relationship with the consultant, but refused to disqualify himself. He voted to approve the casino project, which failed by a single vote. The Commission on Ethics, a statewide body charged with enforcing Nevada's ethics laws, censured the councilmember, concluding that he should have recused himself since his relationship with the developer's consultant was "substantially similar" to the enumerated prohibited relationships.

Although the trial court upheld the Commission's decision by applying a test balancing the interests of the official in exercising his First Amendment rights against the state's interest in securing the integrity of public processes, the Nevada Supreme Court applied a "strict scrutiny" test and invalidated the ethics law. Applying strict scrutiny, the court held that the law was facially unconstitutional, and although the governmental interest in protecting the integrity of the process is "compelling," the recusal statute was not "narrowly tailored" because it lacked standards to inform officials what relationships would require recusal.

The U.S. Supreme Court will address this Question Presented:

The Nevada Supreme Court held that the vote of an elected official is protected speech under the First Amendment and that the recusal provision of the Nevada Ethics in Government Law is subject to strict scrutiny. Under that standard of review, the court concluded that a portion of the recusal statute was overbroad and facially unconstitutional. The question presented is:

Whether the First Amendment subjects state restrictions on voting by elected officials (i) strict scrutiny, as held by the Nevada Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit, (ii) the balancing test of Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), for government-employee speech, as held by the First, Second, and Ninth Circuits, or (iii) rational-basis review, as held by the Seventh and Eighth Circuits.

SCOTUSblog posted the cert stage briefs here. The Court's docket entry is here. The New York Times posted "Justices to Hear Case on Recusal Laws" about the case.

Stay tuned. We will post the briefs as they are filed. As we noted above, this case could have a broad impact on the land use process, so we will be following it closely.


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii